Your instructors are not responsible for your training

A long time ago my wife and I realized – more like it really was completely obvious – that we, and we alone, were responsible for our own health care. We could not place our health care decisions in the hands of our PCP or any other medical professional. We had to research the issues (of both general health and specific concerns), and actively manage and integrate the conventional and non-conventional approaches that would achieve the results we wanted.

Likewise, you, and you alone, are responsible for your own self-defense training. You have to set intelligent goals, do your research, and actively manage and integrate conventional and non-conventional approaches that achieve those results. You cannot place those decisions in the hands of any one instructor…although plenty of good advice abounds.

Your basic NRA instructor may not see the need for, indeed may be hostile to, realistic self-defense firearms training.  Your local (or even national-stature) “tactical” instructor has his or her own, by-definition-limited, knowledge set and agenda (which involves putting food on the table) and may or may not have an the background and/or knowledge to teach appropriate tactics and techniques.  Your LE vet may not have much of a clue other than what he or she learned from their agency.  A military SF vet may not fully understand civilian rules of engagement, and his tactics may tacitly or unconsciously assume you are working in a team environment.  A competitive shooter may not understand the differences between competitive shooting and street shooting and the training implications thereof.  You can learn valuable things from each of these people, but it’s your job to figure out what’s useful and applicable to you, now, from what all they teach.  And since few of us have unlimited training time or funds, you also have to determine which instructors you will expend the resources to train with.

One thing that I can tell you is that a firm grounding in the law of self-defense is critical.  Only fools who carry guns don’t fully educate themselves in this area.  Andrew Branca and Massad Ayoob are obviously the go-to resources here, although I would also recommend the Armed Response DVD I made on the subject (in which I no longer have any financial interest).  This is the area that most instructors ignore, and frankly that’s because they don’t know much about it.

Here’s a few other pointers when assembling your training toolbox:

  • Are the instructors professional?  Do they come across as mature, educated, sincere adults?  Are they organized or do they go all stream of consciousness?  Do they have credentials?  Do they post embarrassing things on YouTube and the Net?
  • Are they teaching some component of defense that’s critical to you to learn more of? Are you, instead, simply going over again what you’re good at or what’s fun for you?
  • Are you focusing on the solid fundamentals of defense, or are you attending a wannabe camp?
  • Are you learning all aspects of self-defense including unarmed skills and intermediate weapons, and the transitions between them?
  • Are you engaging in realistic (not too prolonged, not to cut-and-dry) simulations?  Are you learning judgement?

I could go on, but this isn’t meant to be an exhaustive dissertation.  The point is that you need to be the active manager of your training…and the subsequent skills you wind up with (or don’t).

Finally: I hit this point often and hard because it’s the part of self-defense that most people foolishly omit. If you carry a gun for self-defense, you have to know the law. Invest the money you’d spend on shaving a tenth of a second off your splits with Andrew Branca’s book or seminars — it’ll pay far greater dividends. Visit this link to learn more, and use the discount code “streetstandards” for a 10% discount.


One thought on “Your instructors are not responsible for your training

  1. Repost from previous comment, more germane here as a list of questions a student might ask themselves if they want to take responsibility for their learning (andragogy vs. pedagogy):

    I think the main point is here: someone looking to train needs to take into consideration a lot of factors. Most (maybe all?) people shopping online via forums, whatever for instruction “don’t know what they don’t know” and may have no basis in previous experience or instruction to make their own decisions and conduct the right kind of due diligence. There’s lots of questions that can be asked:

    Do I (the prospective student) know what I need to learn?
    How do I know that? Where did I learn that from? (YouTube, gun shop sales staff, whatever?)
    Do I know what kind of instructors suit my real needs, as opposed to what I want to believe my needs are? (Maybe you’d be better off taking the Basic Class at Roger’s instead of Uber-Tactical Ninja 101 from whoever the latest tactic-cool celebrity is?)
    How do I determine if a prospective instructor is qualified to teach ME?
    What’s more important? An instructor’s body count and Tier 1 credentials, or his ability to improve MY performance?
    What kind of instructor experience is important to me learning best? Law enforcement? Street or tactical? Military? Military police, special operations, cooks? (I’m just a lowly, lowly cook….points to whoever can identify that quote, LOL)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s